National museums will stay free, and overseas visitors will not be charged

What happened
On 29 September 2026, the government confirmed that everyone will continue to enjoy free admission to England's national museums. Free entry to national museums was introduced in 2001. Earlier this year, the government said it would work with the museum and tourism sectors and with local leaders to explore whether charging overseas visitors could help museums' finances. That commitment was part of its response to Baroness Margaret Hodge's independent review of Arts Council England. The answer is no. The government says it believes charging overseas visitors could deter domestic visitors, and that the impacts and benefits of charging would not be felt equally across the sector. It will therefore not introduce charges for overseas visitors. The announcement came with figures on what national museums are worth. They add more than £1 billion a year to the economy. Seven of the UK's ten most visited museums are national museums. In 2025, 7.1 million people visited the Natural History Museum and 6.4 million visited the British Museum. It also set out funding. The £1.5 billion Arts Everywhere Fund is providing £760 million for museums. A further £600 million of infrastructure funding is supporting national museums and DCMS-sponsored cultural organisations with critical maintenance and estates work. Another £160 million is going to local and regional museums, through the Museum Estates and Development Fund and a £13.6 million Museum Transformation programme. The government will work with Arts Council England and the sector on a long-term strategic plan for museums.
Why this matters
Free museum entry is one of those policies people forget is a policy. It has been in place for twenty-five years, long enough that most adults under forty have never known anything else. It is also unusual. In much of the world, the great national collections charge, and charge properly. Visiting three major museums in a European capital can cost a family more than the train fare to get there. The proposal considered here was narrower than scrapping free entry altogether. It was to charge overseas visitors while keeping entry free for people who live here. That is how several countries do it, and it has obvious appeal: the tourists help pay for the upkeep, the residents keep the benefit. The government's reasoning for rejecting it is worth reading, because it is not just about fairness. It says charging overseas visitors could deter domestic visitors. That sounds odd at first, until you think about the practical mechanics. Charging some people means checking everyone. A desk, a queue, proof of address, a decision at the door. The thing that makes a free museum different is that you can walk in for twenty minutes on a wet Tuesday without deciding anything. A checkpoint ends that, for residents as well as visitors. The second reason is about the sector. The benefits would not be felt equally. The British Museum would collect a great deal. A regional museum with few overseas visitors would collect almost nothing, while still bearing the cost of the system.
What the evidence actually says
The figures published alongside the decision are real and worth holding onto. National museums add more than £1 billion a year to the economy. Seven of the UK's ten most visited museums are national museums. The Natural History Museum had 7.1 million visitors in 2025; the British Museum had 6.4 million. Those numbers cut both ways in the argument. They show how much traffic a charge could have taxed. They also show the scale of what a charge might have discouraged. It is fair to say the decision rests on judgement rather than a published study. The government states its belief that charging could deter domestic visitors, and its assessment that the benefits would fall unevenly. It has not published modelling alongside the announcement. The funding figures are more concrete, and they show where the money is expected to come from instead: £760 million for museums within the £1.5 billion Arts Everywhere Fund, £600 million of infrastructure funding for national museums and DCMS-sponsored organisations, and £160 million for local and regional museums. That last figure is the one regional visitors should watch. Maintenance backlogs are the quiet crisis in museums. A collection can be magnificent and the roof can still leak, and leaking roofs close galleries. The Museum Estates and Development Fund is aimed at exactly that, and the £13.6 million Museum Transformation programme is aimed at helping organisations move to more sustainable business models. Note the geography. This announcement concerns England's national museums. Museums in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are handled separately.
Practical advice
If you are planning days out, a few things follow. - Free entry to the permanent collections stays free. Special exhibitions usually charge, and always have. That distinction catches people out. - Book a free timed ticket where one is offered. The busiest national museums use them, and turning up without one on a Saturday in half term is a gamble. - Go on a weekday morning or in the last two hours of the day if you can. The difference in crowding is enormous, especially with children. - Do not try to see everything. Two rooms done properly beats nine rooms at a trot, and museums are free, so you can always come back. - Look beyond the famous ones. Many national museums have outposts outside London, and regional museums are often excellent and almost empty. - If you enjoyed a visit and can afford to, use the donation box or the shop. Free entry does not mean free to run, and voluntary support is now more clearly part of the model. If you are travelling from abroad, nothing changes. You will not be charged.
What to know
The government confirmed on 29 September 2026 that universal free admission to England's national museums will continue, and that overseas visitors will not be charged. The idea had been explored as part of the response to Baroness Margaret Hodge's independent review of Arts Council England. The reasons given are that charging overseas visitors could deter domestic visitors, and that the impacts and benefits would not be felt equally across the sector. Free entry was introduced in 2001. National museums contribute more than £1 billion a year to the economy, and seven of the UK's ten most visited museums are national museums, with 7.1 million visits to the Natural History Museum and 6.4 million to the British Museum in 2025. Funding continues through the £1.5 billion Arts Everywhere Fund, including £760 million for museums, £600 million of infrastructure funding, and £160 million for local and regional museums. A long-term strategic plan for museums will be developed with Arts Council England. Sources: Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, "National museums to remain free for everyone", 29 September 2026, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/national-museums-to-remain-free-for-everyone. Baroness Margaret Hodge, "Arts Council England: an independent review", https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/arts-council-england-an-independent-review-by-baroness-margaret-hodge. This article is for general information and does not replace advice from a doctor, pharmacist or other qualified healthcare professional. Admission arrangements for special exhibitions and for individual museums can change, so check the museum's own website before you travel.
Related articles

Twenty separate flare-ups: the French mosquito season nobody expected
France has had an unusual mosquito season, and the figures are now in. Santé publique France, the country's public health agency, published its enhanced survei…

Fever, rash and sore joints: a northern virus turns up in Germany
The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control has reported something that had not happened before: Germany's first known case of symptomatic Sindbis vi…

259 of them in one county: the dengue you can catch in Florida
On 12 October 2026, the UK's National Travel Health Network and Centre – the service behind TravelHealthPro – added dengue in the United States to its outbreak…
