Back to Blog & Insights
Technology

100 electrodes screen-printed onto fabric, and a PFAS test that plugs into a laptop

Qurexa Editorial Team28 October 20266 min read 0 0
100 electrodes screen-printed onto fabric, and a PFAS test that plugs into a laptop

What happened

On Tuesday 27 October 2026, researchers at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology announced a portable device that can detect PFAS chemicals in water quickly and without a laboratory. PFAS stands for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. They are a large family of man-made chemicals used since the 1940s in non-stick pans, waterproof clothing, food packaging, firefighting foam and many industrial processes. They are often called forever chemicals, because the bonds that make them useful also make them extremely slow to break down. The device was developed by the institute's Micro, Bio and Nanofluidics Unit. The work was published in the journal Biosensors and Bioelectronics on 16 October 2026. It works like this. Electrodes are screen-printed onto strips of fabric. Those electrodes are coated with a material called a molecularly imprinted polymer, which is essentially a plastic moulded with holes shaped to fit one specific molecule. In this case, the holes fit PFOS or PFOA, two of the best-known PFAS chemicals. When those molecules lock into the holes, the electrical current through the strip changes. A small commercial device called a potentiostat, plugged into a smartphone or laptop, measures that change. A bigger change means more PFAS. No added chemicals are needed to run the test.

Why this matters

Testing water for PFAS today usually means sending a sample to a specialist laboratory with expensive mass spectrometry equipment. That is accurate, but it is slow and it costs money, so it gets done sparingly and in a small number of places. That creates a gap. Contamination tends to be local: near a former industrial site, near an airfield where firefighting foam was used, near a landfill. The places most likely to have a problem are often not the places with routine monitoring. A cheap, portable test changes what is possible. If a strip can be made in a few hours and read with a laptop, you can test many sites, often, and look at how levels change over time rather than taking one snapshot a year. In the UK this is live. The Drinking Water Inspectorate sets guideline values for PFAS in drinking water, and water companies are required to monitor and act where levels are high. The Environment Agency and the Royal Society of Chemistry have both pushed for tighter limits and better monitoring in rivers and groundwater. Dr Mark Sullivan, one of the researchers, described the goal as developing a sensitive, low-cost technology that can eventually be used outside specialised laboratories. Professor Amy Shen added that accurate and accessible detection is an important step toward addressing PFAS contamination. Note the word eventually. It is doing honest work in that sentence.

What the evidence actually says

This is a laboratory prototype described in a peer-reviewed paper. That is a meaningful standard, and it is also an early one. The paper is titled 'NanoMIP-embedded metal-phenolic networks as an advanced electrochemical platform for the ultrasensitive detection of PFOA and PFOS in water'. The word ultrasensitive appears in the title, and the team describe detecting extremely small concentrations. However, the announcement does not publish the detection limits or the numerical results. Those figures are in the full paper. Anyone making decisions on the back of this should read it rather than the press release, and that includes us: this article does not quote a sensitivity figure because the announcement did not give one. The prototype used 100 disposable electrodes, screen-printed onto repurposed fabric in a few hours. No price is given. The team describe the platform as low cost and easy to manufacture, which is a claim about manufacturing potential rather than a shelf price. The test targets two specific PFAS chemicals, PFOS and PFOA. The PFAS family contains thousands of compounds. A test for two of them is useful because those two are among the most studied and most regulated, but it is not a test for PFAS in general. What has not happened yet: independent validation against standard laboratory methods on real-world samples at scale, regulatory approval, or commercial production. Until those happen, this is a promising method, not an available product.

Practical advice

If you are on mains water in the UK, your supply is tested by your water company under rules set by the Drinking Water Inspectorate. You can ask your supplier for the water quality report for your postcode. Most publish this online and will send it on request. If you use a private water supply, such as a borehole or spring, the rules are different. Your local council has a duty around private supplies and can advise on testing. Private supplies are where most of the real uncertainty sits. Be careful with home filter claims. Some jug filters and under-sink systems make PFAS reduction claims, and some are supported by independent certification while others are not. Look for testing against a recognised standard rather than marketing language, and check what the filter is certified to remove. Do not panic-buy bottled water on the basis of a headline. Bottled water is not automatically lower in PFAS, and it is not routinely tested for it in the way mains supply is. If you live near a known contamination site and are worried, the Environment Agency and your local authority are the right places to start, not a private testing company with a sales pitch.

What to know

Researchers at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology have built a portable sensor that detects the PFAS chemicals PFOS and PFOA in water using electrodes screen-printed onto fabric and read by a smartphone or laptop. The work was published in Biosensors and Bioelectronics on 16 October 2026 and announced on 27 October 2026. The method needs no added chemicals and the prototype used 100 disposable electrodes made in a few hours. Detection limits, costs and independent validation against standard laboratory methods were not published in the announcement. It is a prototype, not a product you can buy. For households, the practical route remains your water company's quality report for mains supply, or your local council for a private supply. Sources: EurekAlert (Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology), 'A portable device for accurately and rapidly detecting PFAS in water', 27 October 2026, https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1149202 ; Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 'NanoMIP-embedded metal-phenolic networks as an advanced electrochemical platform for the ultrasensitive detection of PFOA and PFOS in water', 16 October 2026, DOI 10.1016/j.bios.2026.119315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2026.119315 ; Drinking Water Inspectorate, https://www.dwi.gov.uk/

#PFAS#water quality#sensors#environment#chemistry#research

Related articles