If 16-year-olds get the vote, who teaches them how? MPs have opened an inquiry
What happened
On 22 October 2026 the House of Commons Education Committee launched a new inquiry called "Preparing for votes at 16: the role of the education system". The background is the government's plan to let 16- and 17-year-olds in England vote in general elections for the first time. That is being done through the Representation of the People Bill, which is currently at Committee Stage in the House of Lords. The committee wants to look at whether the education system is ready. It will examine how schools can teach students about polarising political issues while staying impartial and avoiding bias, and how to tackle misinformation and disinformation. It will look at the role of citizenship education, at personal, social, health and economic education, usually shortened to PSHE, and at other subjects, as well as extra-curricular activities and youth settings. It will also look abroad, and at home. The inquiry will draw lessons from places that have already lowered the voting age to 16, including Scotland, Wales, Malta and Austria. Helen Hayes MP, who chairs the committee, framed it as a question rather than a complaint: if the vote is being extended, is citizenship education ready to prepare young people for it? She was clear that the inquiry is not about steering young people towards particular views, and said the aim is to help every young person become an engaged and discerning democratic participant, and to produce evidence-based recommendations for the government.
Why this matters
16- and 17-year-olds can already vote in Senedd elections in Wales and Scottish Parliament elections in Scotland. So the principle is not new in the UK. What is new is England, and the general election. The gap the committee has spotted is in the curriculum. Citizenship is compulsory in England from Year 7 to Year 11. It is not compulsory from Year 1 to Year 6. The government has agreed to make citizenship lessons compulsory in those lower years too, and will consult on curriculum ideas. The harder issue is the second one in the inquiry's scope. Teaching a 15-year-old how Parliament works is reasonably straightforward. Teaching them how to tell a real claim from a convincing fake one, in a feed designed to reward outrage, is a different skill, and most teachers were not trained for it. There is also the impartiality question. Schools in England have a legal duty to avoid promoting partisan political views and to present balanced treatment of political issues. Teachers already handle this, but doing it with pupils who will be on the electoral register before they leave sixth form raises the stakes.
What the evidence actually says
It is important to be accurate about what this announcement is. It is the start of an inquiry, not a set of findings. The committee has not concluded anything yet. It is asking for evidence. The committee's own framing avoids the two easy positions. It is not claiming young people are too ignorant to vote, and it is not claiming the curriculum is fine as it is. It is asking what has to change, and what teachers need. The international comparisons are likely to be the most useful part. Austria lowered its voting age to 16 in 2007 and has been studied for nearly two decades. Scotland did so for the 2014 independence referendum and then for Scottish Parliament and local elections. Wales followed for Senedd elections. Malta lowered its voting age in 2018. That is a reasonable body of real experience to draw on rather than guesswork. What the available reporting does not tell us is the deadline for submitting evidence. Committee inquiries normally publish a call for evidence with a closing date on the committee's own page, so anyone wanting to contribute should check there. A separate point worth keeping straight: the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Schools, Learning and Assessment has run its own inquiry into votes at 16. That is a different body from the Education Committee, and its report is not the same thing as this inquiry.
Practical advice
**If you work in a school,** this is a chance to tell MPs what you actually need rather than being told later. Submitting written evidence to a select committee is free and does not require a lawyer. Check the Education Committee's page for the call for evidence and closing date. **If you are a parent,** you do not need to wait for a curriculum change. The single most useful thing at home is to talk about where a claim came from. Who is telling me this? How would they know? Who benefits if I believe it? **Teach the check, not the conclusion.** Showing a teenager how to look for the original source of a claim is more durable than telling them which claims are wrong. **If you are 16 or 17,** you can already register to vote at 16 in England and Wales, and at 14 in Scotland, so that you are on the register when you become eligible. Registering takes about five minutes on GOV.UK. **Watch out for lookalike registration sites.** Registering to vote in the UK is free and happens on GOV.UK. Anyone charging for it is not official. **If your school runs a mock election or debating club,** these turn out to be some of the most effective preparation there is, and the inquiry is explicitly looking at extra-curricular settings.
What to know
The Commons Education Committee has launched an inquiry into whether England's education system is ready for 16- and 17-year-olds to vote in general elections, as proposed in the Representation of the People Bill now in the Lords. It will look at citizenship education, PSHE, other subjects and extra-curricular activities, at how schools handle polarising issues impartially, and at tackling misinformation. It will draw on Scotland, Wales, Malta and Austria, which already allow voting at 16. Citizenship is currently compulsory only from Year 7 to Year 11, and the government has agreed to extend it to primary years. This is the beginning of the inquiry, not its conclusions. Sources: UK Parliament, Education Committee, "Is the curriculum preparing young people to vote from 16? Education Committee launches new inquiry", 22 October 2026, https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/203/education-committee/news/218435/is-the-curriculum-preparing-young-people-to-vote-from-16-education-committee-launches-new-inquiry/; FE News, "Ready to vote at 16? MPs to Examine how Schools Teach Politics, Impartiality and Misinformation", 22 October 2026, https://www.fenews.co.uk/fe-voices/ready-to-vote-at-16-mps-to-examine-how-schools-teach-politics-impartiality-and-misinformation/. This article is for general information only. It is not legal, financial or medical advice. For anything about your own health or medicines, speak to a doctor, pharmacist or other qualified healthcare professional.
Related articles
Five sections, no new rules: the violence guidance schools were just sent
On 22 October 2026 the Department for Education published guidance called "Understanding and preventing serious violence in education". It was updated the follo…
72.3% is the best reception result yet. The free school meals gap got wider
On 22 October 2026 the Department for Education published the Early Years Foundation Stage Profile results for 2025 to 2026. This is the assessment teachers ma…
80% said it helps them get to work on time: the breakfast club findings
On 23 October 2026 the Department for Education published the final research report on the Free Breakfast Clubs Early Adopters scheme. The research was carried…