Qurexa Logo
Qurexa

Trust. Care. Deliver.

Back to Blog & Insights
Education

A new qualification called a V Level, and a regulator who says AI must not mark your child's work

Qurexa Editorial Team17 October 20268 min read 0 0
A new qualification called a V Level, and a regulator who says AI must not mark your child's work

What happened

On 16 October 2026, Sir Ian Bauckham, the Chief Regulator of Qualifications at Ofqual, gave a speech at the Confederation of School Trusts annual conference at the ICC in Birmingham. It was titled "Connecting curriculum, assessment and trust – qualifications for the next decade". He covered three things: a new qualification, exams on screen, and artificial intelligence. The new qualification is called a V Level. V Levels are new level 3 vocational qualifications that start in 2027. They will sit alongside A Levels and T Levels. The design is different from a T Level. Each V Level is a smaller qualification. Students take three of them to make up a study programme. And, unlike a T Level, a V Level does not require an industrial placement. The first three V Levels cover education and early years, accounting and finance, and digital systems and data. First teaching is September 2027. A much larger second group follows a year later, in 2028. Sir Ian explained why they are being introduced. He pointed at two problems with BTECs. BTEC is a brand owned by Pearson, and Pearson sets the content. And grades from different vocational providers cannot be directly compared with each other. His argument is that qualification content should be set by government, as it is for GCSEs. On exams on screen, he was clear that no decision has been made. He listed the concerns: whether it can actually be delivered, screen time for children, the digital divide between families, whether schools are ready, and whether exam boards have the capacity. He acknowledged there could be benefits for some tasks and for some pupils with special educational needs. He said more will follow in due course. On artificial intelligence, he posed three questions and answered all three. Do we still need qualifications? Yes. He argued AI will increase the need for specialised knowledge and judgement, not reduce it. How should AI cheating be handled? It must not be allowed. He identified extended coursework as particularly vulnerable, and noted that universities including Princeton and UCL are moving back towards invigilated exams. He warned that outsourcing your thinking to AI weakens learning. Should AI do the marking? No, not for complex work. He cited hallucination, bias, the risk of AI extending mark schemes without human input, and the difficulty of challenging an AI decision. He said humans must "remain in charge", backed by legislation and regulation.

Why this matters

If you have a child in Year 9, 10 or 11, the V Level part is the bit that will reach your kitchen table. For years, the vocational route at 16 has been confusing. There were BTECs, then T Levels arrived, and now V Levels are coming. Each change leaves parents trying to work out which qualification a college is actually offering and whether universities and employers will respect it. The thing that makes V Levels genuinely different is the size. A T Level is large and includes a substantial industrial placement, which suits a student who is certain about their direction. A V Level is smaller, and you take three. That means a student can mix: three V Levels in related areas, and the structure allows for changing your mind in a way a single large qualification does not. It also removes the placement requirement, which has been one of the harder parts of T Levels to deliver, particularly in areas with fewer local employers. The argument about who sets the content is less visible but arguably more important. At the moment, a BTEC's content is set by a commercial company. Sir Ian's position is that it should be set by government, so that a grade means the same thing wherever it was awarded. Whether or not you agree, it is a real issue: if two students in different colleges get the same grade in the same subject from different providers, parents and employers reasonably assume that means the same thing, and currently it may not. The AI section matters for a different reason. It is a regulator saying, publicly, that it will not let machines mark complex work. Given how much pressure there is to cut costs in every public system, that is a meaningful commitment.

What the evidence actually says

This was a speech, not a policy document, and it is worth separating the firm from the unsettled. Firm: V Levels exist as a plan. The first three subjects are named. First teaching is September 2027, with a larger group in 2028. That is specific enough to plan around. Unsettled: on-screen exams. Sir Ian explicitly said Ofqual has not decided. So anyone telling you that GCSEs are going digital is ahead of the facts. His listed concerns, particularly the digital divide and school readiness, are the reasons this has not moved faster. A regulator's position, not a law: the AI statements. Sir Ian said humans must remain in charge, backed by legislation and regulation. That describes what he thinks should happen. He is in a strong position to influence it, but a speech does not change the rules. It is also fair to note that his criticism of BTECs is a position, not a neutral finding. Pearson would put the case differently. The point about grades not being directly comparable across vocational providers is a genuine technical problem; the conclusion that government-set content is the answer is a judgement. On the AI cheating point, the examples given are real: universities including Princeton and UCL moving back towards invigilated exams is a documented trend. The reasoning on AI marking is also substantive rather than vague. Hallucination means an AI producing confident, plausible, wrong answers. The point about difficulty challenging decisions is the one parents should care about most: if a machine marks your child's work and you want to appeal, you need to be able to find out why that mark was given. The speech also referred to England's PISA performance and to hundreds of thousands of teenagers taking exams, without giving figures. So no statistics on those points should be attributed to it.

Practical advice

If your child is choosing post-16 options now, V Levels are not available yet. First teaching is September 2027. So for a student starting in 2026 or September 2027 at the latest, the practical questions are still about A Levels, T Levels, BTECs and apprenticeships. If your child is currently in Year 9, they may be among the first V Level cohort. Ask your school or local college directly whether they intend to offer them, and which ones. Not every college will offer every subject. Do not treat a change in qualification name as a change in what matters. Whatever the label, the useful questions are the same. What does this lead to? Do universities and local employers recognise it? Who teaches it and how is it assessed? On AI, the practical advice for families is the opposite of the technology advice. If your child is doing extended coursework, the regulator has just publicly identified it as the most vulnerable to AI cheating. That means scrutiny is likely to increase. The safe habit is simple: use AI to check understanding, never to produce work that will be submitted. Keep drafts and notes. If a student's work is ever questioned, a trail showing how it developed is the most useful evidence they can have. Ofqual publishes its updates on its own news pages and on GOV.UK, and that is where any decision on on-screen exams will appear.

What to know

Sir Ian Bauckham, Ofqual's Chief Regulator, spoke at the Confederation of School Trusts conference in Birmingham on 16 October 2026. V Levels are new, smaller level 3 vocational qualifications. Students take three to form a programme. They need no industrial placement. The first three subjects are education and early years, accounting and finance, and digital systems and data, with first teaching in September 2027 and a larger group in 2028. His case for them is that government should set vocational content, as it does for GCSEs, so grades mean the same thing across providers. No decision has been made on moving exams on screen. His concerns include deliverability, screen time, the digital divide, school readiness and exam board capacity. On AI, he said qualifications are still needed, AI cheating must not be allowed, extended coursework is the most vulnerable, and AI should not mark complex work. He said humans must remain in charge, backed by legislation and regulation. Sources: GOV.UK (Ofqual), "Connecting curriculum, assessment and trust – qualifications for the next decade", 16 October 2026, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/connecting-curriculum-assessment-and-trust-qualifications-for-the-next-decade ; Ofqual news, https://www.ofqual.gov.uk/news/ ; GOV.UK, Ofqual, https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofqual This article is for general information and is not careers, education or legal advice. Speak to your school, college or a qualified careers adviser about individual choices.

#Ofqual#V Levels#qualifications#artificial intelligence#exams#post-16 education

Related articles