Qurexa Logo
Qurexa

Trust. Care. Deliver.

Back to Blog & Insights
Education

8,539 recordings gone, and twenty pupils who could not appeal their mark

Qurexa Editorial Team15 October 20267 min read 0 0
8,539 recordings gone, and twenty pupils who could not appeal their mark

What happened

On 14 October 2026, Ofqual fined ABRSM £150,000 over failures in how it kept and managed the evidence from music exams. ABRSM is one of the best-known music examination bodies in the country. It has been recognised by Ofqual since 2010 and runs regulated music qualifications both in person and digitally. Digital exams are recorded, and those recordings are the evidence of what a candidate actually played or sang. Ofqual's Enforcement Panel found serious shortcomings in how ABRSM retained, managed and made available that evidence. Three separate incidents were identified, between 2024 and 2025. The first was a software error. 8,539 audio recordings of completed assessments were not kept. Twenty candidates who asked for a review of their marking could not have that review fully carried out, because the original evidence was not all there. The second was deletion in error. Recordings and marking records for 16 candidates were deleted. Their results were delayed, and they could not fully challenge their marks. The third involved suspected malpractice. A single tutor overseas had entered 710 candidates for assessments. ABRSM identified potential malpractice, but 231 of the recordings were no longer available, which limited how far the investigation could go. Separately, around 72,000 certificates were issued with incorrect qualification titles. ABRSM later corrected this, told candidates and offered replacement certificates, but Ofqual found it had not initially taken all reasonable steps to put the problem right. As part of the settlement, ABRSM agreed to pay the £150,000 fine, contribute £10,000 towards Ofqual's investigation costs, and commission an independent audit of its record-retention arrangements. Amanda Swann, Executive Director for Delivery at Ofqual, said awarding organisations "have a responsibility to retain assessment evidence", and that "given the seriousness of these failings, we have taken enforcement action". Ofqual also acknowledged that ABRSM identified the issues itself and has taken action to improve.

Why this matters

Graded music exams are not a small corner of education. Hundreds of thousands of people take them, many of them children, and the grades count. They appear on UCAS forms. Grade 6 and above carry UCAS tariff points. They are used by music schools, by conservatoires, and by teachers deciding who is ready for what. Behind every one of those grades sits a family that paid an entry fee and a child who practised for months. Which is why the right to challenge a mark matters. If you think the examiner got it wrong, you can ask for a review. That review depends entirely on someone being able to go back and listen to what actually happened. Take the evidence away and the right disappears with it. The twenty candidates in this case still had their marks. What they lost was any way of questioning them. That is a quiet kind of unfairness and it is hard to put right after the fact. The malpractice case is the more serious of the two in principle. If one tutor enters 710 candidates and there are concerns about how those assessments were conducted, that affects every honest candidate taking the same qualification, because the value of a grade depends on it meaning the same thing for everyone. 231 missing recordings meant that question could not be fully answered. The 72,000 wrong certificate titles are a different sort of problem: not unfair, but genuinely confusing for anyone, including an employer or an admissions officer, trying to work out what a certificate represents.

What the evidence actually says

A few things deserve to be said in ABRSM's favour, because Ofqual said them. ABRSM found these problems itself and reported them. It has taken action to improve its arrangements. It settled, paid, and agreed to an independent audit. That is the behaviour a regulator wants to see, and it is the reason this is a fine rather than something more serious. It is also important to be precise about what was and was not affected. These were failures of record-keeping, not of marking. There is no finding here that any candidate was marked wrongly. The finding is that some candidates could not have a review properly carried out, which is a different thing. The numbers are specific and limited. 8,539 lost recordings sounds enormous, and it is, but the identified consequence was twenty candidates unable to have a full marking review, plus 16 whose records were deleted. Most of the 8,539 did not generate a review request. The suspected malpractice is suspected. Ofqual's notice says ABRSM identified potential malpractice and that the investigation was limited by missing recordings. No finding of malpractice against the tutor or candidates has been published. The certificate error was corrected, candidates were notified, and replacements were offered. The criticism is about the initial response, not the eventual one. For scale, this fine sits alongside other recent Ofqual enforcement: in August 2026 it fined OTHM £25,000 and EAL £150,000 over qualification failures, and it issued its first Chief Regulator's Rebuke to WJEC over failings in four Eduqas qualifications between 2019 and 2025. So this is part of a visible pattern of enforcement rather than a one-off.

Practical advice

If you, or a child you look after, takes music exams or any other graded qualification, there are some genuinely useful habits here. Keep your own record of every exam. The date, the grade, the candidate number, the exam centre, and a photograph of the certificate when it arrives. Store it somewhere you will still find it in five years. This takes two minutes and saves hours later, and this case shows exactly why. Check a certificate when it arrives, properly. Name spelled correctly, instrument correct, grade correct, and the qualification title correct. If something is wrong, say so immediately. Awarding bodies have deadlines for corrections. Know that you can ask for a review of marking. Every regulated awarding organisation must have a process, and it must be published on its website. There is normally a deadline, often quite short after results. If you think a result is wrong, do not wait and think about it. If an awarding organisation will not resolve a complaint, you can escalate. For regulated qualifications in England, Ofqual takes complaints about awarding organisations. Ofqual does not change individual marks, but it does act on how organisations behave, which is how cases like this one come to light. If you are affected by the certificate error, ABRSM has offered replacement certificates. Contact them directly and ask. And a word on exam stress, because it is the part nobody puts in a press release. The weeks around a graded exam are hard on some children, and on some adults. Poor sleep, loss of appetite, stomach aches and reluctance to practise at all are common signs. If that tips into something that worries you, your GP or school nurse is the right first call, and your pharmacist can help with practical things like sleep routines.

What to know

Ofqual fined ABRSM £150,000 on 14 October 2026 over failures in retaining and managing music exam evidence. Three incidents between 2024 and 2025: a software error meant 8,539 audio recordings were not retained, leaving 20 candidates unable to have a full marking review; recordings and marking records for 16 candidates were deleted in error, delaying results; and 231 recordings were unavailable in an investigation into suspected malpractice involving one overseas tutor who had entered 710 candidates. Separately, around 72,000 certificates were issued with incorrect qualification titles. ABRSM corrected this, notified candidates and offered replacements, but Ofqual found its initial response inadequate. ABRSM identified the issues itself, settled, will pay £10,000 towards Ofqual's costs, and will commission an independent audit of its record-retention arrangements. These were record-keeping failures, not marking failures. No candidate has been found to have been marked incorrectly. If you take graded exams, keep your own records, check certificates on arrival, and know that marking reviews have deadlines. Sources: GOV.UK (Ofqual), "Ofqual fines ABRSM £150,000 over data retention failures", 14 October 2026, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ofqual-fines-abrsm-150000-over-data-retention-failures; Ofqual, how to complain about an awarding organisation, https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofqual; The Ofqual blog, Chief Regulator's Rebuke and enforcement updates, https://ofqual.blog.gov.uk/ This article is for general information and is not legal advice. For help with exam stress or a child's wellbeing, speak to your GP, school nurse or pharmacist.

#Ofqual#music exams#ABRSM#qualifications#appeals#student rights

Related articles