Qurexa Logo
Qurexa

Trust. Care. Deliver.

Back to Blog & Insights
Education

Update: heads have now passed a motion of no confidence in Ofsted's leadership

Qurexa Editorial Team12 October 20266 min read 0 0
Update: heads have now passed a motion of no confidence in Ofsted's leadership

What happened

This is a follow-up to a story we covered earlier this week. The research into Ofsted's new inspections has now produced a consequence, and it is a serious one. On 9 October 2026, the Association of School and College Leaders passed a motion of no confidence in Ofsted's leadership. ASCL is the union that represents headteachers, principals and other senior leaders in schools and colleges. The motion was passed by ASCL Council, the union's ruling body. Its wording is specific: the council said it has no confidence in the ability of Ofsted's leadership to "address the damage being done by the new inspection system". The vote is about the leadership's capacity to fix the problem, not about inspection in principle. The union went further than a statement. It has agreed to survey its members on whether to hold an indicative ballot on industrial action if change is not forthcoming. It also wants inspections paused while Ofsted reviews the system. ASCL's General Secretary, Pepe Di'Iasio, has said the scope for negotiation with Ofsted has been "exhausted". All of this came on the same day as Ofsted-commissioned research into how the new framework is working. That research found 88% of surveyed schools said their inspection had negatively affected their own or their staff's wellbeing, with half reporting a significant impact. Ofsted's Chief Inspector, Martyn Oliver, said the findings showed the watchdog was "on the right track". Unions called the same findings damning.

Why this matters

Two things make this different from the usual run of union-versus-regulator disagreement. The first is who is doing it. ASCL represents the people who are inspected and who run the schools. A no-confidence vote from the headteachers' own body is not a fringe position; it is the sector's senior management saying the system is not working. The second is the possibility of industrial action by school leaders. That is rare. Headteachers do not reach for ballots easily, because the people most inconvenienced are the pupils and families they are responsible for. The fact that it is even being surveyed is a measure of how far this has gone. There is also a timing problem. The reformed framework is less than a year old. It replaced the old single-word judgements with report cards giving one of five ratings across at least six judgement areas. If it is now reopened, that would be the second major change to school inspection in little over a year. For parents, that matters in a practical way. Report cards are meant to help you understand a school. A system that is being redesigned while it is being used is harder to read, and comparisons between schools inspected at different points become less reliable.

What the evidence actually says

It is worth separating what is established from what is being argued about. Established: ASCL Council passed the motion on 9 October 2026. The union has committed to survey members about an indicative ballot. The Ofsted-commissioned research found 88% of surveyed schools reported a negative effect on wellbeing, with half describing it as significant. Also worth noting: the figures vary by sector. In further education, FE Week reported that three quarters of providers said their inspection had negatively affected wellbeing, and that most responses came from independent training providers. The FE framework uses up to 16 judgement areas rather than six. Contested: what those numbers mean. Ofsted's Chief Inspector reads the research as evidence the reforms are heading the right way, pointing to findings about inspections being more collaborative and respectful. Unions read the same research as evidence of harm. Both are describing real parts of the same dataset. Not established: what happens next. An indicative ballot is a step before a formal ballot, which is itself a step before action. Nothing has been scheduled. Ofsted has not agreed to pause inspections. One further caution. Separate legal challenges over the report cards have been reported in the past, including an earlier judicial review brought by the National Association of Head Teachers. Those are older developments and should not be confused with this week's vote.

Practical advice

If you are a parent, the main thing is not to over-read a report card right now. A report card is one view of a school, taken on particular days, under a framework that is itself under review. It is useful information. It is not a verdict, and it is not the only thing available to you. The things that tell you most about a school are harder to put in a table. Visit if you can. Ask how the school handles a child who is struggling, not just a child who is thriving. Ask about staff turnover, because schools where good teachers stay tend to be schools that are well run. Talk to parents whose children already go there. If you are a teacher or school leader and your workplace has been affected, your union is the right first call, and ASCL, NAHT and the NEU all run member support lines. Occupational health referrals exist for a reason, and asking for one is not an admission of failure. If inspection stress is affecting your sleep, mood or physical health, speak to your GP. This sounds obvious, but the research found half of schools reported a significant impact on wellbeing, and significant impacts on wellbeing are a medical matter as well as an industrial one. For everyone else: expect the system to change again, and treat any school comparison that mixes old and new judgements with care.

What to know

This is a deliberate follow-up to our earlier coverage of the Ofsted inspection research, because a major new development has happened. On 9 October 2026, ASCL Council passed a motion of no confidence in Ofsted's leadership's ability to address the damage being done by the new inspection system. The union will survey members on whether to hold an indicative ballot on industrial action, and wants inspections paused pending a review. Its General Secretary says the scope for negotiation is exhausted. The same day, Ofsted-commissioned research found 88% of surveyed schools said inspection had negatively affected wellbeing, half of them significantly. Chief Inspector Martyn Oliver said the findings showed Ofsted was on the right track; unions disagreed. Nothing has been decided. An indicative ballot has not been held, and Ofsted has not paused inspections. The reformed framework is less than a year old. For parents: read report cards as one piece of evidence among several, and be careful comparing schools judged under different frameworks. For school staff affected: contact your union, and see your GP if your health is suffering. Sources: Association of School and College Leaders, "ASCL passes motion of no confidence in Ofsted's leadership", 9 October 2026, https://www.ascl.org.uk/News/Our-news-and-press-releases ; Schools Week, "9 in 10 schools say Ofsted inspections negatively impact wellbeing, report finds", October 2026, https://schoolsweek.co.uk/9-in-10-schools-say-ofsted-inspections-negatively-impact-wellbeing-report-finds/ ; Ofsted / GOV.UK, "Independent research finds Ofsted's new-look inspections are more collaborative and respectful", 9 October 2026, https://www.gov.uk/government/news ; FE Week, "ASCL council passes no confidence vote in Ofsted's leadership", October 2026, https://feweek.co.uk/ascl-council-passes-no-confidence-vote-in-ofsteds-leadership/ This article is for general information and does not replace advice from a doctor, pharmacist or other qualified healthcare professional.

#Ofsted#ASCL#school inspection#teacher wellbeing#headteachers#education policy

Related articles