Qurexa Logo
Qurexa

Trust. Care. Deliver.

Back to Blog & Insights
Education

3,334 teenagers tracked: the pupils social services know are the ones missing school

Qurexa Editorial Team21 September 20266 min read 0 0
3,334 teenagers tracked: the pupils social services know are the ones missing school

What happened

Researchers in the United States have published a study connecting two problems that are usually studied separately: children known to child protection services, and children who miss a lot of school. The work was led by Arya Ansari, an associate professor of human development and family science at The Ohio State University, with Kierra M.P. Sattler at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. It was published in 2026 in the journal Children and Youth Services Review, and was reported on 18 September 2026. The researchers used data from the Future of Families Child Wellbeing Study, which has followed 3,334 children from birth to age 15 across 20 cities. That long-running design is what makes the study unusual — it can look at the same young people over years rather than taking a single snapshot. The findings were consistent. Young people who had contact with child protective services missed more school than their classmates. That was true for both authorised absences and unauthorised ones. Teachers were 14 percentage points more likely to contact their families about attendance. And those young people reported feeling less connected to their school than their peers did.

Why this matters

The point the researchers make is that these two things are almost never looked at together. Attendance is usually treated as a school problem, handled by attendance officers and letters home. Child protection is treated as a social care problem, handled by a different service with different records. Ansari's team argue that contact with child protection is itself a source of difficulty in a young person's life — not simply a marker of trouble elsewhere. The scale in the United States is striking. Ansari notes that by the time they reach 18, more than a third of American children will likely have been affected by a child protection investigation, and that the figure is above half for Black children. For anyone working in a British school, the underlying question is the same one, even though the system and the numbers are different. When a child is persistently absent, is anyone checking what else is going on in that child's life before the letters start? Both absences mattered here, and that detail is easy to miss. It was not only the unauthorised absences. Authorised ones were higher too — which points at illness, appointments and family disruption rather than at anything a truancy policy is designed to address.

What the evidence actually says

Two important limits, stated plainly. First, this is American research, using American data about an American child protection system. England's system, its thresholds and its attendance rules are different. The finding that should travel is the relationship between the two, not the figures. Second, and more important: this study shows an association, not a cause. Children come to the attention of child protection services because something difficult is happening at home — poverty, illness, instability, harm. Those same things also cause children to miss school. So the study cannot tell you whether the child protection contact itself worsens attendance, or whether both are consequences of the same underlying hardship. The authors are alert to this and treat the contact as one adversity among several rather than as the single cause. What the long-running design does give is confidence that this is a real, persistent pattern rather than a one-year blip. The most useful finding may be a negative one. The researchers looked at whether improving how connected pupils feel to school would close the attendance gap. It did not. Feeling connected helped all pupils roughly equally; it did not specifically help the children with child protection contact catch up. Ansari's own conclusion was suitably modest: "school connectedness is one piece of the puzzle, but it ultimately can't be the only answer" — pointing instead at housing instability, food insecurity and health as the things that actually need fixing. That is an unglamorous answer. It is also a believable one. A wellbeing programme does not solve a family that has had to move three times in a year.

Practical advice

For parents and carers: If your child is missing school because life is hard at the moment, say so. Schools can only work with what they know, and a letter about attendance is a much worse conversation than an honest one before it arrives. Ask about support rather than waiting to be offered it. Many schools have a pastoral lead, a family support worker or access to a school nurse. These are rarely advertised. Watch for the slide. Attendance problems build gradually. A day here and there becomes a pattern over a term, and the longer it runs the harder returning feels for the child. For anyone working in a school: Look at authorised absences too. This study found the gap in both kinds. A child with a lot of 'permitted' absence can slip past a system watching for truancy. Check whether the attendance team and the safeguarding lead talk to each other about the same child. The researchers' central point is that these two conversations usually happen separately. Do not expect a belonging initiative to fix it on its own. It helps everybody a bit. It did not close this gap. If you are unsure of the rules on absence, the government's guidance for parents in England sets out what schools can and cannot authorise.

What to know

A study following 3,334 young people from birth to 15 found that those with child protection contact missed substantially more school than their peers — both authorised and unauthorised absence — were more likely to have teachers contacting home, and felt less connected to school. It is American data and it shows association rather than cause, since the same family hardship tends to produce both. But the pattern is consistent over years, and the practical implication travels: a child with poor attendance often has something going on that an attendance policy alone will not reach. The researchers tested whether making pupils feel more connected to school would close the gap. It did not. Their conclusion was that housing, food and health are where the real problem sits. Sources: The Ohio State University via Phys.org, 'Kids involved with child protective services miss much more school than their peers', 18 September 2026, https://phys.org/news/2026-09-kids-involved-child-school-peers.html; Ansari A and Sattler KMP, Children and Youth Services Review, 2026, via EurekAlert!, https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1144610; GOV.UK, 'School attendance and absence', https://www.gov.uk/school-attendance-absence This article is for general information and does not replace advice from a qualified professional.

#school attendance#safeguarding#children#education research#absence#wellbeing

Related articles