£460 million schools thought they had to find: the pay rise is now fully funded
What happened
On 16 September 2026, the government confirmed that the 3.5% teacher pay rise will be funded in full, removing a gap that schools had been expected to cover from their own budgets. Education Secretary Lucy Powell set this out in a letter to Daniel Kebede, general secretary of the National Education Union. The union reported the contents. Here is what changed. Teachers in England were awarded a 3.5% pay rise from September 2026. The government had said it would fund about 1.7% of that. The remaining 1.8% was expected to come from school budgets, through savings schools would have to find themselves. Across the country, that shortfall was estimated at around £460 million. The money to close it comes from a reduction in pension costs. Employer contributions to the teachers' pension scheme have fallen, which leaves schools spending less than they had budgeted for. The question was whether the government would take that saving back, which is what 'clawed back' means in this context. Powell confirmed it would not. 'We can confirm this reduction in costs will not be clawed back, and as such, we are confident that schools will be able to cover the costs of the teacher pay award, at a national level,' she wrote. Daniel Kebede said: 'Finally, we have a government that accepts the reality that any teacher pay award must be fully funded.' Pepe Di'Iasio of the Association of School and College Leaders called it a 'breakthrough' that was 'very welcome'.
Why this matters
An unfunded pay rise is not really a pay rise for a school. It is an instruction to spend more on the same staff, with the same money. When that happens, something has to give. In practice, the things that give first are the things that are easiest to cut: teaching assistants, who are often on the most precarious contracts; music, drama and sports provision; school trips; building maintenance; and the number of adults available to support children with additional needs. So a decision that sounds like an accounting technicality shows up in classrooms as fewer adults and fewer opportunities. The timing matters too. Schools set budgets for the year in the spring and summer. Many had already planned on the basis that they would need to find that 1.8%, which for some meant consultations on staff reductions. Confirmation in September comes late in that cycle, though not too late to change plans for the rest of the year. There is a broader point about recruitment. Teacher recruitment and retention has been a persistent problem, particularly in secondary maths, physics, computing and modern languages. Pay is only part of why people leave, but a pay award that arrives alongside redundancies elsewhere in the same school sends a mixed message.
What the evidence actually says
Two phrases in the announcement deserve attention, and they are easy to skim past. The first is 'at a national level'. The government's confidence is that schools nationally can cover the award. That is a statement about totals, not about individual schools. Pension savings do not land evenly. A school with an older, more experienced and better-paid staff will save more than a school with lots of early-career teachers. Small schools, and schools with falling rolls, may find their share of the saving does not match their share of the cost. So some schools will be comfortably covered, and some will still be tight. Both can be true at once, and the national figure hides it. The second is that this is a reduction in costs rather than new money. No additional funding is being sent to schools. What has happened is that an expected expense fell, and the government has decided to let schools keep the difference. That is genuinely worth having - it was not guaranteed, and unions had been pressing for exactly this. But it is a different thing from an increase in the core schools budget. It is also worth noting the source. The confirmation came in a letter reported by the NEU, and was welcomed by ASCL. That is credible - both are the relevant professional bodies and the Education Secretary's words are quoted directly - but the detailed implementation will follow in departmental funding guidance. Finally, none of this addresses the wider pressures on school budgets: energy costs, special educational needs provision, and buildings. Those remain.
Practical advice
If you are a parent or carer, there is not much to do here, but a couple of things are worth knowing. If your child's school has been consulting on staff changes or cuts to provision this term, this announcement may affect those plans. It is a reasonable question to raise politely with the headteacher or at a governors' meeting - not as a challenge, but because the picture has genuinely changed since summer budgets were set. School budgets are public. Academy trusts publish annual accounts, and maintained school funding is published by local authorities. If you want to understand what your school is actually working with, the information is available. If you are a teacher or support staff member, check your September payslip against the new pay scales. Pay awards are usually backdated, and errors do happen. Your union can help if something looks wrong. It is worth noting that this award covers teachers. Support staff - teaching assistants, office staff, caretakers, catering staff - are on a separate pay structure negotiated differently, and this announcement does not cover them. And if you are considering teaching as a career, the funded award is a modest positive signal, but talk to people doing the job before deciding. Workload, not pay, is the reason most often given by those who leave.
What to know
The government has confirmed it will fully fund the 3.5% teacher pay rise from September 2026, closing a gap of roughly £460 million that schools had expected to find from their own budgets. The money comes from lower employer pension contributions, which the government has confirmed it will not claw back. That is a real and welcome change, secured after sustained pressure from unions and school leaders. The caveat worth holding on to is the phrase 'at a national level'. Pension savings vary between schools, so some will be fully covered and others less so. This is also not new money for schools. Energy, buildings and special educational needs pressures are unchanged. Sources: Schools Week, 'Government commits to fully funding teacher pay rise, NEU reports', 16 September 2026, https://schoolsweek.co.uk/government-commits-to-fully-funding-teacher-pay-rise-neu-reports/. National Education Union, https://neu.org.uk/. Association of School and College Leaders, https://www.ascl.org.uk/. This article is for general information and does not replace advice from a doctor, pharmacist or other qualified healthcare professional.
Related articles
Free school meals: schools get six extra weeks, but families still have to apply
The Department for Education has given schools and councils six more weeks to complete free school meal eligibility checks. The deadline has moved from Thursda…
Ofsted checked 68 nurseries in one chain. Here is what inspectors found
Ofsted has published an update on its regulatory action against Bright Horizons, one of the UK's large nursery groups. Since September last year, Ofsted has be…