Back to Blog & Insights
Travel

Heathrow's third runway only works if airlines pay to clean up, advisers say

Qurexa Editorial Team16 September 20265 min read 0 0
Heathrow's third runway only works if airlines pay to clean up, advisers say

What happened

The government's official climate advisers have said Heathrow cannot expand under current policies without the UK missing its legal climate targets. The Climate Change Committee published its advice in September 2026, at the government's own request. It was reported widely on 15 and 16 September. The committee's conclusion was blunt. Under existing policy, there is no credible pathway for Heathrow to expand while Britain still reaches net zero by 2050. But the advice is not a flat no. The committee said expansion could work if the aviation industry is required to deal with its emissions. CCC chair Nigel Topping put it directly, saying the government cannot expand Heathrow Airport without requiring the aviation industry to clean up its emissions. The committee recommended legislation obliging the industry to address all of its emissions by 2050, either through much greater use of sustainable aviation fuel or through engineered carbon removal credits. It also called for a 25-year strategy for net-zero aviation, for airlines to be phased into paying the full cost of decarbonising, and for contingency plans if the key technologies do not scale up as hoped.

Why this matters

If you fly, this is ultimately a question about what your ticket will cost. The committee's recommendation is that airlines should progressively pay the full cost of cleaning up their emissions. Airlines do not absorb costs like that indefinitely. They pass them on. So the practical translation of this advice is: flying gets more expensive, gradually, over years rather than months. It also matters for capacity. Heathrow is full. The airport's chief executive has said more than 40 existing and prospective airlines are seeking slots there, with about three-quarters of proposed new routes being long-haul connections. Without expansion, that demand does not disappear. It shows up as higher fares on the busiest routes and fewer new destinations. For people in Lincolnshire and the East Midlands, there is a further angle. Long-haul travel from this part of England usually means a connection through Heathrow or a drive to Manchester. What happens to Heathrow's capacity affects how easy that is.

What the evidence actually says

The core of the committee's case rests on two numbers that are worth understanding. The first is about sustainable aviation fuel, usually shortened to SAF. This is fuel made from waste, plants or captured carbon rather than crude oil. It is the aviation industry's main answer on emissions. SAF currently accounts for less than 1% of global aviation fuel use. It also costs several times more than conventional jet fuel. That gap is the heart of the problem. A solution that covers under one percent of demand and costs several times as much cannot absorb a large increase in flights any time soon. The second point is about forecasts. Updated projections suggest rising flight numbers, combined with a reduced expected role for clean-aviation technology fixes, will leave aviation emissions stubbornly high in 2050. It is worth being clear about what the CCC is and is not. It is an independent statutory body that advises government. It does not make the decision. Ministers can accept or reject its advice. It is also worth noting that this advice does not say expansion is impossible. It says the current policy framework does not support it, and sets out what would need to change.

Practical advice

Nothing changes for a trip you have already booked. Here is what is worth knowing for the longer term. **Expect gradual fare increases on flying, not a sudden jump.** Policy changes of this kind phase in over years. **Consider rail for European trips.** For destinations like Paris, Brussels and Amsterdam, train journey times from London are competitive once airport time is counted, and fares booked early are often reasonable. **Book long-haul early if Heathrow capacity matters to you.** Constrained slots tend to mean less last-minute availability. **Do not pay extra for vague carbon offsets.** Offset quality varies enormously. If you want to spend money on this, look for schemes that specify what is being funded and how it is verified. **If you have a health condition, plan flights properly.** Long-haul travel affects circulation, hydration and medicine timing. Ask your pharmacist about adjusting doses across time zones, and carry medicines in hand luggage with a copy of your prescription. **Check your travel insurance covers existing conditions.** Many standard policies do not unless you declare them.

What to know

The Climate Change Committee advised the government that under current policies there is no credible pathway to expanding Heathrow while meeting the 2050 net zero target. CCC chair Nigel Topping said expansion cannot happen without requiring the aviation industry to clean up its emissions. The committee recommended legislation requiring the industry to address all emissions by 2050, a 25-year net-zero aviation strategy, and phasing in the full cost of decarbonisation for airlines. Sustainable aviation fuel makes up less than 1% of global aviation fuel and costs several times more than conventional fuel, which is the central obstacle. The CCC advises. Ministers decide. Sources: BBC News, 'Third Heathrow runway should only go ahead if airlines pay for cleaner flying, say advisers', 16 September 2026, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c607lxnvn7r4o; Phys.org, 'Heathrow expansion incompatible with UK legal climate targets, major report finds', September 2026, https://phys.org/news/2026-09-heathrow-expansion-incompatible-uk-legal.html; Climate Change Committee, https://www.theccc.org.uk/. This article is for general information and does not replace advice from a doctor, pharmacist or other qualified healthcare professional.

#Heathrow#aviation#flying#climate#travel policy#airports

Related articles