Noon till eight: what a small trial found in type 1 diabetes
What happened
Researchers at the University of Illinois Chicago have tested something that has never properly been tested in type 1 diabetes before: eating within a set eight-hour window each day. The trial was published in the journal Diabetes Care and reported in the days around 10 September 2026. It involved 32 adults who had type 1 diabetes and were also living with overweight or obesity. Participants in the time-restricted eating group ate only between midday and 8pm. Outside that window they did not eat. They were compared with a control group carrying on with standard care. The main result concerned HbA1c, which is a blood test showing average blood sugar over roughly the previous three months. It is the number most people with diabetes will recognise from their review appointments. In the time-restricted group, average HbA1c fell by about 0.5 percentage points. Just as importantly, the researchers looked hard at safety. They found no increase in dangerously high or dangerously low blood sugar, and no increase in diabetic ketoacidosis, a serious complication of type 1 diabetes. Weight was the thing that did not change much. By month six, body weight in the time-restricted group had fallen by around 2.19%, which was not a significant difference compared with the control group. The researchers describe this as the first evidence that time-restricted eating could become another tool for managing type 1 diabetes.
Why this matters
Type 1 diabetes is not the same condition as type 2, and the difference matters here. In type 1, the body does not make insulin at all, because the cells that produce it have been destroyed by the immune system. It is not caused by diet or weight, and it cannot be reversed by either. People with type 1 must take insulin to live, and they spend every day doing arithmetic that most of us never think about: matching insulin to food, activity, illness, stress and sleep. Because of that, most diet research in diabetes has focused on type 2. Advice about eating patterns is often simply lifted across, which is not always safe. There is also a specific worry about fasting in type 1. If you take insulin and do not eat, blood sugar can drop dangerously low. That is why people with type 1 have often been told to avoid fasting approaches, or at least to be extremely careful with them. So the interesting part of this trial is not really the HbA1c number. It is that a structured eating window was tested carefully in this group, and the safety signals looked reassuring. And for context, a drop of 0.5 percentage points in HbA1c is a meaningful change. It is the sort of improvement that would usually be welcomed if it came from a medicine.
What the evidence actually says
This needs to be read carefully, because the trial is genuinely promising and genuinely small. Thirty-two people is not many. In a trial that size, a few individual results can move the average noticeably, and the findings could look different in a larger group. The researchers say so themselves: bigger studies are needed before this can be recommended broadly. The participants were also a specific group. They all had type 1 diabetes and were living with overweight or obesity. Whether the same results apply to someone with type 1 who is a healthy weight, or to a teenager, or to someone with frequent hypos, is simply not known from this trial. The weight finding deserves honesty too. The study set out partly to see whether time-restricted eating would reduce body weight more than standard care. On that measure, it did not produce a significant difference. The blood sugar result is the positive finding here; the weight result is not. The safety findings are encouraging but come with the same limitation. Serious events like diabetic ketoacidosis are uncommon. In a group of 32 people, you would not necessarily expect to see any, so not seeing any does not prove the approach is safe for everyone. And it should go without saying, but these participants were supervised in a clinical trial, with monitoring in place. That is a very different situation from trying it alone.
Practical advice
This one comes with a firmer warning than most. If you have type 1 diabetes, do not change your eating pattern without talking to your diabetes team first. Insulin doses are matched to when and what you eat. Change one without changing the other and you risk a hypo, which can be serious. If you are interested, bring it to your annual review or your diabetes nurse. It is a perfectly reasonable thing to ask about, and the trial gives your team something concrete to discuss. Continuous glucose monitoring makes any change like this far safer, because it shows what is actually happening rather than what you assume. Most people with type 1 in England are now eligible for CGM on the NHS under NICE guidance. If you do not have it, ask. Know your hypo signs and always have fast-acting glucose within reach. That applies whatever eating pattern you follow. If you have type 2 diabetes rather than type 1, this trial does not apply to you directly, though eating windows have been studied more in type 2. Still speak to your team, particularly if you take insulin or a sulfonylurea, as both can cause hypos. And if you fast for religious reasons, such as during Ramadan, speak to your diabetes team well in advance. There is established UK guidance for this, and preparation makes a real difference.
What to know
A randomised trial of 32 adults with type 1 diabetes and overweight or obesity found that eating only between noon and 8pm lowered average HbA1c by about 0.5 percentage points over six months, without increasing severe hypoglycaemia, severe hyperglycaemia or diabetic ketoacidosis. Body weight did not change significantly compared with standard care, which was one of the things the trial set out to test. The study is small and the participants were a specific group, so this is early evidence rather than a recommendation. The researchers are clear that larger trials are needed. Its real value is that fasting-style eating in type 1 diabetes has largely been avoided as too risky, and this trial tested it carefully and found reassuring safety signals. That is a reason to ask your diabetes team, not a reason to start on your own. Sources: Diabetes Care (American Diabetes Association), 'Efficacy and Safety of Time-Restricted Eating in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial', 2026, https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article-abstract/doi/10.2337/dc26-1093/172390/; ScienceDaily (University of Illinois Chicago), 'Eating only 8 hours a day may help control Type 1 diabetes', 10 September 2026, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/09/260909231740.htm; Renal and Urology News, 'Time-Restricted Eating May Help Patients With Type 1 Diabetes', September 2026, https://www.renalandurologynews.com/news/time-restricted-eating-may-help-patients-with-type-1-diabetes/ This article is for general information and does not replace advice from a doctor, pharmacist, diabetes nurse or other qualified healthcare professional. If you take insulin, do not change your eating pattern without speaking to your diabetes team first.
Related articles
Researchers found a way to win at Wordle 99% of the time. The trick is counterintuitive
Researchers at Binghamton University, part of the State University of New York, have published a mathematical strategy for the word game Wordle that succeeds in…
Some bats live 50 years. A new study looked at why, and the answer is surprising
Bats should not live as long as they do. In the animal world there is a rough rule: small things die young. A mouse weighs about the same as a small bat and li…
Where have all the wasps gone? A strange summer for a much-hated insect
Something odd has happened in British gardens this summer. The wasps largely have not turned up. By late August most of us are usually batting them away from a…